The
Cooperative Way
(The
following is an excerpt of an article which was printed in a publication
“Indian Opinion” in the year 1945. In it, Cheddi Jagan, for the
first time, enunciates his concept of a “free and independent
Guiana.”
)
Our past has
been dominated to a great extent by a philosophy of individualism and
greed. More and more we are beginning to realize that this acquisitiveness
for personal gain has to be supplanted by cooperation for mutual gain.
Technocrats tell us that with an adequate labour supply - a few hours per
day per individual - using the most modern technological methods at our
disposal, we can greatly increase our productive capacity. One has only to
think of the tens of millions of dollars spent in war materials during the
recent conflict to realize the heights which production can reach. If it
can be achieved in wartime, why not in peacetime?
This heightened
production in itself does not mean an increase in the standard of living
of the average individual. That can come about only when the abundantly
produced goods are justly and adequately distributed. Looking over the
past few decades, we see the shortcomings in the process of distribution
in the capitalist countries. Wealth is becoming more concentrated in the
hands of a fewer number of persons. Even in
Denmark, one of
the most social-minded and progressive of capitalist countries, in 1937:
“0.4 per cent of people owned one-fourth of the property. 1.4 per cent
owed the next fourth, 4 per cent the third fourth, leaving only the last
fourth to be owned by 96 per cent of the people.” A similar situation more
or less exists in most capitalist countries. Such a situation cannot be
said to be conducive to the well-being, happiness and increased standard
of living of all the people.
In the light
of these facts, let us take a look at
British Guiana.
Our standard of living must be necessarily low because firstly, our
productive capacity is restricted either by antiquated methods of
production or by the production of only raw materials; and secondly,
because distribution is so constituted that the average worker-consumer
has to pay large profits to a whole series of middlemen. Not until we
embark on a well-planned, collective industrial company can we get “out of
the rut.” This of course presupposes control of government machinery of
the people, by the people and for the people.
Let us take
bauxite for example. Had
British Guiana
been independent and further had it been federated to
Dutch Guiana,
we could easily have become a productive centre for finished aluminum and
its products. That industry alone could have given adequate employment to
Guianese and materially raised the standard of living. Instead, our
government is merely content in allowing the Canadians to scratch the
surface of the earth with a handful of Guianese labour.
It therefore
behoves the working class people to get control of government through
their constitutional ballots in our forthcoming elections, with a view
towards complete independence. A free and independent Guiana can easily
cooperate and eventually federate with her Latin neighbours, especially
contiguous Brazil. One finds in these days of planned industrial and
agricultural economy that anachronistic boundaries made between various
small countries hundreds of years ago are more a hinderance and a cause of
friction.
© Nadira Jagan-Brancier 2000

Dr Jagan’s letter written in 1942 to his friend,
Dr Orrin Dummett
Edward
Sanatorium
Telephone Cottage
Naperville, Illinois
Sep 4th,
1942
My Dear
Orrin,
Very good news indeed to hear that you are getting along well
in Nashville. I am sure that as you get more adjusted to the environment
you will like it all the more. As usual, I am feeling fine, so much so
that I am beginning to feel skeptical of the diagnosis.
Next week
I am going to ask for a stomach-lavage smear test, because so far all my
spectrum test were negative. At the same time I am going to take a look at
the three x-rays. At present, I am brushing up on a book on Pulmonary
Tuberculosis.
I agree with you that the South and its prejudices will have
to go. Now is the time for the Negro population to demand equality, and to
see that the Atlantic Charter materialize and bear fruit at home. After
the war I’m afraid, when there is no more international quarrel and common
enemy, all nations will drift back to internal social and economic
conflicts. Now is the time for all suppressed and minority groups to
demand not only theoretical but also practical equality, so that the
common foe will be revisited by all on an equal footing. It is only in
this light can the civil disobedience campaign of Gandhi be viewed. How
can a country or a people be asked to fight for something they do not
possess? To ask the Indians, or for that matter anyone else, to fight for
the Four Freedoms*, when those principles of the Atlantic Charter are
denied them is morally invalid. Britain is fighting to liberate Poles,
Czechs, Greeks and what not but liberation of countries under its own
clutches is out of the question. I suppose you have read of the labour
troubles and riots that occurred in Jamaica. Yes my friend, war is
murderous and bloody, but at the same time it initiates changes - changes
which are necessary for us. Clifton Close said that no matter who wins in
the Orient, for the Orient itself there has been a Renaissance. History is
in the making, whether anyone likes or not. There has been an awakening -
the status quo that was is gone. Yes, now is the time for us to organize,
to lobby, to make propaganda and demands, for now changes can be most
rapid and to our benefit.
I am very sorry that we drifted apart when in Chicago for the
past four years. Now that I look back and reflect, I feel rather guilty,
and ashamed of myself. My economic status in my environment was perhaps to
be blamed for my attitude and actions. They were all very emotional and
superficial. To be poor is a crime, but to be poor and ambitious is a sin.
You have to do things which you otherwise do not care to do. Finance -
social and economic status - has influenced me so much, that were I to
write an autobiography, I would perhaps call it “The Struggle of
Complaisances.” It would really be a psychological expose. Unknowingly, -
now that I look back – I must have hurt your feelings. If I did, I wish
you place yourself in my position and then perhaps you will forgive me my
superficial attitudes.
I am very grateful for you offer of help. At the present time,
I am happy to say I am adequately supplied. Please convey my regards to
Lois. Good luck and cherrio
Cheddi
I have
really said a mouthful, haven’t I?
* Four
Freedoms
Freedom of
Speech & Expression, Freedom to Worship God, Freedom from Wealth, Freedom
from Fear,
President
Rooseveldt
© Nadira Jagan-Brancier 2000